Choco Almond Nutty Cookies
Nut-based cookies with 40-50% almonds, no maida, but high in calories and fat from nuts and chocolate.
§01 — Six-Axis Assessment
Red = warningThreshold applied: YELLOW due to insufficient label disclosure but presence of sugar/chocolate indicated in the product description, implying added sugar likely present (at least top-5 by typical cookie formulations). The available sources do not provide grams of sugar per 100g, so the RED threshold (≥10g added sugar/100g or sugar in top-3 ingredients) cannot be confirmed from evidence here. Evidence source is the official product page referenced in the research, but it does not disclose sugar grams.
Threshold applied: YELLOW because the research classifies this as ultra-processed (NOVA 4) (cookie with processed cocoa/chocolate components), but other axes are not evidenced as RED from disclosed nutrition/ingredients in sources. The official product page is cited as the basis for this NOVA judgement, though a full additive list is not provided. Under v1, NOVA 4 with otherwise non-red axes maps to YELLOW.
Threshold applied: GREEN because available sources mention 40–50% almonds as the main ingredient and do not mention partially-hydrogenated oils or trans fat sources. No saturated fat grams per 100g are disclosed, but the research notes no palm/hydrogenated fats mentioned on available pages, supporting a more favorable nut/cocoa-butter fat profile. Because hard numeric SFA/trans data are not provided, this remains evidence-limited but non-triggering for RED/YELLOW based on the cited page.
Threshold applied: GREEN due to no sodium value disclosed and no evidence suggesting high-sodium formulation; the research estimates <200mg/100g and notes almonds are naturally low sodium. However, because sodium is not disclosed on cited pages, this is evidence-limited and cannot confirm crossing the YELLOW (300–625mg/100g) or RED (≥625mg/100g) thresholds. On available evidence, no high-sodium trigger is met.
Threshold applied: YELLOW because marketing frames the product as 'no maida', 'protein-rich', and 'full of fibre', which may overstate healthfulness given this is still a calorie-dense chocolate/nut cookie; the research notes lack of third-party lab certification/verification on available pages. There is no evidence of an active ASCI/FSSAI/NCPCR ruling, and the 'no maida' claim is described as verifiable/accurate, so RED is not triggered. Thus it fits soft health framing unsupported by disclosed nutrition details (YELLOW).
Threshold applied: GREEN because the research states no FSSAI notices, recalls, adulteration findings, or court cases identified in available sources up to May 2026. No specific regulatory document is provided—only an e-commerce listing is cited—so this is limited to absence-of-evidence in the gathered sources. With nothing indicating a pending complaint or adverse action, it remains GREEN on available evidence.
§04 — Evidence Trail
§06 — Ingredients
Almonds (40-50%), Cocoa solids, Cocoa butter, Sugar, Wheat flour (non-maida), Butter/Ghee, Baking soda, Salt, Vanilla extract. [Exact ingredient list not fully disclosed on available product pages; this is a reasonable reconstruction based on 'no maida' and 'nut-based' claims. Verify pack label for complete and accurate list including any emulsifiers, preservatives, or allergen declarations.]