Index/Biscuits/Parle-G Glucose Biscuit
Entry № 001 · Biscuits
Parle-G Glucose Biscuit product shot from official Parle site

Parle-G Glucose Biscuit

Parle · Not specified

Parle-G is an ultra-processed glucose biscuit made primarily from refined wheat flour, sugar, and refined palm oil [1]. Its high sugar content of 25.

Processing tierSugar loadFat / oil typeMarketing deceptionSodiumRegulatory history
§ A · Six-axis assessment
Fast answer

Why this verdict

Context-dependent. Not an automatic no, but the watch points matter if this is a frequent buy.

1
red flags
3
watch points
2
passes
Verdict driver
Processing tier
Watch closely
Processing tier, Sugar load, Fat / oil type, Marketing deception
Passed checks
Sodium, Regulatory history

This card is the decision shortcut. The detailed evidence and citations live in the six-axis cards below.

Sugar load
Think twice trigger

5g of added sugar in a small 25g serving (5 biscuits). This represents a significant portion of the WHO's recommended daily limit of 25g of free sugars [2, 5].

Processing tier
Don't eat trigger

Classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food) due to its industrial formulation of refined flour, sugars, oils, and additives like emulsifiers and artificial flavours [3].

Fat / oil type
Think twice trigger

Contains refined palm oil, a fat high in saturated fatty acids. The product is free of trans fats as per its declaration [1].

Sodium

Sodium content is 395mg per 100g, which is moderate and unlikely to be a major concern in a typical serving size.

Marketing deception
Think twice trigger

The prominent "Glucose" branding creates a health halo, implying a source of direct energy. While technically true, this masks the reality of it being a high-sugar, low-fibre, ultra-processed product [4].

Regulatory history

Parle-G has a long, multi-decade history with no significant FSSAI recalls, major court cases, or regulatory controversies reported in mainstream media [4].

§ B · Nutrition

Per 100 g

Energy451 kcalper 100g
Protein6.5 gper 100g
Total Fat12.5 gper 100g
Saturated Fat6.0 gper 100g
Trans Fat0 gper 100g
Carbohydrate78.0 gper 100g
Total Sugars25.5 gper 100g
Added Sugars8.5 gper 25g serving
Sodium395 mgper 100g
§ C · Ingredients

As declared on pack

Refined Wheat Flour (Maida) (66.8%), Sugar, Refined Palm Oil, Invert Sugar Syrup [Sugar, Citric Acid], Raising Agents [503(ii), 500(ii)], Iodised Salt, Milk Solids, Emulsifier [di-acetyl tartaric acid esters of mono and di-glycerides of edible vegetable oils] and Dough Conditioner [223]. CONTAINS ARTIFICIAL FLAVOURS (VANILLA).

§ D · Timeline
  1. January 1938
    Parle-G launched as 'Parle Gluco' [Source ↗]
    parleproducts.com · [1]
  2. January 1982
    Re-branded from 'Parle Gluco' to 'Parle-G' [Source ↗]
    The Economic Times · [4]
  3. January 2013
    Parle-G becomes the first FMCG brand in India to cross Rs 5,000 crore in retail sales [Source ↗]
    The Economic Times · [4]
  4. May 2015
    WHO releases its guideline on sugar intake, recommending adults and children reduce their daily intake of free sugars to less than 10% of their total energy intake. [Source ↗]
    who.int · [2]
  5. March 2020
    Reports emerge of Parle recording its best sales in decades during the COVID-19 lockdown [Source ↗]
    The Economic Times · [4]
  6. May 2024
    ICMR releases updated 'Dietary Guidelines for Indians' highlighting the negative health impacts of ultra-processed foods. [Source ↗]
    icmr.gov.in · [5]
§ E · Citations

Sources of truth

  1. [1]
    Parle-G Biscuits
    Parle Products
  2. [2]
    Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children
    World Health Organization (WHO)
  3. [3]
    The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing
    Cambridge University Press
  4. [4]
    The biscuit that built a nation: A journey of Parle-G
    The Economic Times
  5. [5]
    Dietary Guidelines for Indians - 2024
    Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)
§ F · Correction

Spotted something we got wrong?

These entries are generated using AI research against authoritative sources. Mistakes are possible — though rare. If a number, date, or claim looks off, send us a citation and we'll review it.